Equality of opportunity
is imperative to the success of a capitalist society like the United States. - Normandin
Parts of this blog will
be related to the State of the Union Address from last Tuesday. If you haven’t
watched it here’s a link:
Notice this is the “enhanced
version” the White House released afterwards. The enhanced version has facts
and figures that bolster the speech (now you can read those figures instead of
spending so much time staring at politicians).
Also, here is a
transcript of the Address.
Education took the
national stage last week when it was a topic in President Obama’s State of the
Union Address. Approximately twenty minutes into the address, key educational
topics were discussed including tuition prices, community college training programs,
and the need for improvement in our public education system. The President
said, “Teachers
matter. So instead of bashing them, or defending the status quo, let’s offer
schools a deal. Give them the resources to keep good teachers on the job, and
reward the best ones. In return, grant schools flexibility: To teach with
creativity and passion; to stop teaching to the test; and to replace teachers
who just aren’t helping kids learn.” From our class discussions it is obvious
that this is easier said than done, especially with teacher’s unions in control
of so many aspects of public education.
Just as we discussed in class last week, evaluating teachers is
essential to improving learning in our public education system. The idea of
creating a teacher evaluation process that includes both peer evaluation as
well as the test scores made by their students seems like a workable solution. If teachers are going to
continue to be evaluated by standardized tests, it seems they would still be
required to teach (at least partially) to the test.
The topic of standardized
tests was a topic we touched on briefly during Professor Kaplan’s tutoring
training. Different states have different tests they require students to take
at the end of an academic year. For students who move to different states during
the school year it can be difficult to transition because the classes may be
covering different topics at different times than their previous school. This
problem, in my mind, can be remedied by a national standardized test. If we
desire to have highly educated students, doesn’t it make sense to have a
national set of education standards for our students?
Luckily I have found an article that articulates many of the problems I
see with education in America here. Ryan Normandin writes for MIT’s newspaper with
his complains in the public education system. In this article Normandin
comments on the confusing curriculum of public high schools and the need for a
national standardized test. Another comment is made with regards to teaching
methods:
lectures give a 5 percent retention rate of
information, while reading gives 10 percent on average. On the other hand,
group discussions offer 50 percent, practice by doing 75 percent, and teaching
others 90 percent.
Doesn’t it make sense how so many of our classes at UNCA (especially
honors courses) are discussion based?
Another interesting moment during the State of the Union is when the
President said, “I call on every State to require that all students stay in
high school until they graduate or turn eighteen.” While I watched it I
remember being a bit taken back. If we require students to stay in high school,
shouldn’t we give them a reason to stay? Waiting for “Superman” showed us that
many students who drop out are either discouraged from learning or have too
many things outside of school (problems at home, for instance) keeping them
from coming back. In Normandin’s article he emphasizes the magnet school as the
solution to the increasing drop out rate. By having schools with different
themes (science and math, arts, etc) it would be easier for students to dive
into a specific subject they find interesting and explore its complexities
while still receiving the general education required by the state. As
this cartoon illustrates, magnet schools allow students to specialized in a
subject of their own choosing.
This
brings me to Normandin’s quote that started off this entry. I believe this
equality of opportunity ties in directly with Nussbaum’s list of Central
Capabilities in our week’s reading. It is interesting to see how this list can
be implemented within the modern education system to provide a new level of
respect for the dignity of students and teachers. Many aspects are already
included in primary education; play is an integral aspect of elementary school
for many children. Affiliation and the ability to have concern for other humans
and interact well with others is another goal of childhood education. I feel
that one of the most important things on the list is promoting sense,
imagination, and thought. Children should feel supported in their learning,
especially because studies have shown how different people learn in different
ways. If Professor Kaplan’s tutoring training has taught us anything it was
that it can take students a long time to learn information, but the time it
takes them is crucial in understanding. Our human dignity requires equal
opportunity to learn and in some cases there is a huge disparity between children
in the educational system today. As this article from the New York Times describes,
some private schools charge up to $40,000 annually in tuition. While public
schools are forced to cut programs due to funding, private schools continue to build new facilities. How is this an even playing field for students in the
New York public school system?
