Taken from the Amazon reviews of Bobos
in Paradise:
Bobos in Paradise is largely an exercise in denial. Brooks wants us (and
himself no doubt) to believe that Bobos are cute, brilliant and idealistic and
their flaws trivial. Furthermore, he argues that they are the new ruling class.
This is more self-delusion on his part. The fact is, bobos are too content in
their little cocoons of consumption to attempt to conquer the world.
This hits on an interesting question
that has certainly come into the mindset of many Americans over the last year.
Who is in charge? With the election coming in less than 200 days this question
is more pertinent than ever.
I do not necessarily agree that bobos
are content to not rule the world and stay in their “cocoons of consumption.”
From anything, it is obvious that bobos enjoy the rush of competition and value
themselves as educated, right-minded people. This is especially true of you
consider how the bobos gained their power through education and merit. As we discussed in class, however,
aspects of this book tend to be a bit dated, especially considering the
economic downturn in the last four years. While people still certainly buy SUVs
and spend lavish amounts on home remodeling, I believe the new era bobos have
more of a focus on “green” things. Perhaps now a bobo would be seen driving a
prius with recycled, reusable grocery bags in the back. Living in Asheville
certainly makes it hard to criticize this type of person. Honestly, I don’t
view the new era bobo as that bad of a person, as Brooks seems to. I believe
that these bobos are doing more good than bad with their lives and while Bobos
in Paradise is clever in
satirizing them, I feel that bobos are perfectly fine in society.
Upon researching more into David
Brooks in addition to watching videos of him speaking, I find Brooks to be a
bit smug and unpleasant. As I read Bobos I was very anxious asking if I was a bobo in my mind.
Maybe it’s my bobo mindset, but because I see nothing wrong with being a
partial bobo, I’ve decided to not be too worried.
In this review of Bobos George Will summarizes and critiques the book, saying:
In its power to set tastes and manners, the Bobo elite makes
America today as hierarchical as in the 1950s. Bobos, says Brooks, are
"epistemologically modest," claiming to be too short on certitude to
be "judgmental." Except, of course, about some things, such as
smoking, which is considered more sinful than breaking at least five
commandments. And Bobos favor the indoctrination of children, who, Brooks
notes, are more "awash in moral instruction" than Victorian children
were. Today's three R's--pumped into them by television and teachers--are
racial sensitivity, recycling and reproduction.
Today, Brooks says, to calculate a person's status, multiply his
net worth by his anti-materialist attitudes. The 1960s countercultural
radicalism has, he says, been reconciled with bourgeois consumption. But
Brooks's thesis--that 1960s radicalism has been gentrified--takes too seriously
the 1960s radicals' own self-flattering estimate of their seriousness.
I feel that Brook’s claim about children being “awash in moral
instruction” to be a bit extreme. Brooks would tell me it’s because I’ve been indoctrinated
with this bobo society, but being conscious of recycling and racial sensitivity
is necessary in today’s climate. Perhaps this is yet another example of Bobos
being dated and a product of a more innocent pre 9/11 time.
On a different note, our small class conversation relating to
plastic surgery got me wondering about the statistics surrounding plastic
surgery. Here’s a chart taken from economist.com related to plastic surgery and
countries around the world:
While the US has the most plastic surgery overall, per capita
America isn’t even in the top five!
I then searched around on youtube for videos explaining this increase in
plastic surgery in South Korea to find the following video.
In it there is a
girl (12 years old!) getting her eyelids reshaped so that she can have a larger
eye. The best part is the clip at the end when Martin Wong comments on the
surgery. He calls it a form of cultural imperialism, viewing it as a form of
racial self-hatred. Once again, the oppressor-oppressed relationship comes into
play, only in this case it relates to aesthetics. The South Korean culture
places a large amount of emphasis on looks, 90% of people polled for a news
article said that look are a factor in acquiring a job. Sure, there is a lot of
pressure in the US to look a certain way, but I do not feel that is a huge
factor in job applications. Perhaps it is because I’m not applying for jobs
where that would be an issue. Still, it makes me quite sad to see 12 year-olds
unhappy with their appearance due to its racial background.
