This entry will discuss many topics, but
first I’d like to start with an article taken from the Huffington Post related to the educational climate of our
schools. While it is intended to be humorous it draws attention to the poor education many
students are receiving every day.
After the
clip went viral on the Internet the creators released a statement saying:
The video that we made as a school project has
received a lot of unexpected media attention, and has been co-opted into an
ongoing political debate that has become quite volatile. It should be known
that we filmed for several hours, during which time many students gave correct
responses; the film represents a short segment of the most entertaining
answers. The bottom line is that we made the video to get a few laughs around our
school, and it turned into something bigger. It was not our intent to polarize
people, set off a firestorm, or get people to point fingers. Having said that,
people will take from it what they will. We want to continue our work as
student journalists in a productive manner.
Objectively
it is unsettling that these students did not know the answers to basic American
facts, but the journalist’s comments are important for placing the video in
context.
A prime
focus of our class is the development of human capabilities and dignity. I
think this week’s reading (Cosmopolitanism by Kwame Anthony Appiah) brought up a very
important topic: it is very easy for an outsider to place judgment and project
views upon other individuals or groups. Within the text Appiah relates this to
the commonly held belief in witchcraft in his home country of Ghana. To most
Westerners a belief in witchcraft would be absurd, but within the context and
belief system of a typical Ghanaian it is perfectly logical. The idea that a
Western individual could go to Ghana and tell them all about their incorrect
belief in witchcraft is terribly presumptuous. I particularly liked the quote
by Melville Herskovits:
There is no way to play this game of making judgments
across cultures except with loaded dice.
This
principle holds true in areas outside of anthropology. Even in our attempts to
understand the issue of education reform it is difficult since we, as college
students, are removed from so many of its current problems. Learning about contemporary
issues as well as other cultures is important, but remembering how a personal
perspective may be misleading is also key. Here’s another quote from Appiah
that I thought was important:
In belief, as in everything else,
each of us must start from where we are.
This
reminds me of the importance of becoming involved WHERE WE ARE to instigate
change. While I would love to see the education system in America change on a
national level it is clear that true change begins within the community. Being
able to leave a positive impact on a young person locally NOW is far more
likely and rewarding than creating legislation that takes years to pass.
Another huge change that can happen is within our mindset and outlook on others
and ourselves. Instead of viewing our personal beliefs and values as the only
valid ones perhaps we should become more tolerant of different beliefs.
This
open-mindedness is a theme that stuck out during the film in class on Tuesday.
The film, ARTS: A Film About Possibilities, Disabilities & the Arts, documented the use of art as a
tool for disabled individuals in expression, exploring, and defining themselves. Many of the notions surrounding disability are society based and
are long overdue for a reassessment. Just as it is hard to judge a different
culture without a proper understanding, it is impossible to pass judgment on
disability without a deep knowledge and appreciation for the circumstance. It
is our nature to attempt to categorize things as “normal” or “different” based
on our own experience, but the truth remains that there are billions of
different experiences in the world.
I deeply
agree with wanting to create more options for expression and exposure for the
disabled, especially those with outstanding talents. During the film, however,
I was troubled by the stressed capitalism on one particular artist. She (I
forgot to write down her name) used her paintings to represent her relationship
with her late husband and the process of death. Selling her artwork symbolized
losing a part of herself, so it was obviously a difficult endeavor for her. It
did not seem obvious to me that she enjoyed selling her artwork, she mentioned
cutting out pieces of the canvas to keep as her own before parting with the
painting. While this bothered her, it seemed that those who knew her were very
excited that she was making money off of her talent. These supporters hoped she
would stop viewing her work as so personal and begin to do it for the profit.
While this supports the capabilities of the artist, I don’t believe it
respected her dignity. It was simply projecting the Western ideals of
capitalism on her talent. I know that those supporting the artist have only the
best intentions and wishes for her, but it is such a shame on how they lost sight
of her expression and emotions within the painting.
As I have
mentioned in earlier blogs, perspective is an extremely important trait to have
living in our modern society. Understanding different cultures and different
abilities can allow us to successfully support human capability and dignity.
Finally, another poignant quote from the ARTS film.
It’s hard to be disabled when you
don’t like the word “disabled.”
With the recent striking down of Prop 8 in California, I leave with this image and quote [from the ruling] of human dignity.

No comments:
Post a Comment